A friend recently parted ways with his 2017 Audi RS6 after a mere 10 months and 12,000 miles, incurring an approximately $22,000 loss on the 42,000-mile used approved vehicle. His initial plan for a 3-4 year ownership with performance modifications was quickly abandoned.
Transitioning from a stage 1 tuned 2018 RS3, the allure of the V8-powered RS6 was strong, but the reality proved disappointing. The RS6’s size and weight hindered its agility, and the adaptive dampers necessitated costly upgrades like Bilstein or KW suspensions. Lowering springs alone were deemed insufficient.
Performance enhancements were further deterred by the limitations of the stock steel brakes during a track event. Fuel consumption also proved to be a significant factor, averaging 15-18 mpg in real-world driving conditions.
While appreciating the overall package, he regretted not undertaking a more extensive test drive. The RS6’s size ultimately compromised its dynamic capabilities, making it less engaging for everyday driving. His primary use case – commuting on the highway – rarely allowed for utilizing the car’s substantial power.
The significant financial loss underscored the importance of careful consideration before committing to a high-performance vehicle like the RS6. While the allure of owning such a car is undeniable, the practicalities of running one can be challenging. For many, the appeal of the 2017 Rs6 might be stronger in theory than in practice. The experience highlights the importance of aligning vehicle choice with driving style and intended use.
